This is a table of the list of TODO used in CLOUDY source files
and the comments following them.
Table from data in 'tabledtodo.txt'
Priority |
Filename |
Line number |
Comment |
0 | atmdat_char_tran.c | 288 | these should be values at 1e5 K
|
0 | conv_base.c | 915 | PvH prefers test against err/10
|
0 | ion_recomb.c | 295 | once debugged, move test to above so that old dr is not needlessly evaluated
|
0 | mole_h2.c | 2212 | get better relationship between cr excit of Lya rate
|
0 | mole_h_step.c | 1521 | update photoelectric opacity for H2 to include real cross sections and energies. this is not a higher priority because when H2 is formed there can be very little ionizing radiation. this process must be trivial compared with the solomon process following reference gives cross section for all energies >>refer H2 photo cs Yan, M., Sadeghpour, H.R., & Dalgarno, A., 1998, ApJ, 496, 1044 Wilms, J., Allen, A., & McCray, R. 2000, ApJ, 542, 914
|
0 | mole_h_step.c | 1532 | must include heating, compton ionization
|
0 | mole_h_step.c | 5303 | had to comment following test out - NA change to hmole caused massive prints
|
0 | opacity_addtotal.c | 524 | these RJRW macros are permanent - remove tests & make final
|
1 | cont_createmesh.c | 466 | do not let temperature fall below 1e4 K for choosing stop temperature, to prevent fine opacity grid from becoming huge
|
1 | cool_carb.c | 235 | add neutral helium Staemmler, V., & Flower, D. R. 1991, J. Phys. B, 24, 2343
|
1 | cool_nitr.c | 127 | update these to Hudson & Bell, MNRAS, 348, 1275 and A&A, 430, 725
|
1 | dynamics.c | 1731 | get following to work
|
1 | heat_sum.c | 436 | add part of hard heat to secondaries
|
1 | mole_h2_create.c | 424 | add this as a Lya excitation process >>KEYWORD Allison&Dalgargo; continuum dissociation;
|
1 | mole_h2_io.c | 1438 | add logic to deduce cs
|
1 | mole_h_step.c | 1363 | equivalent reaction for H2* is not included in chemistry, Big h2 does not include this reaction, what to do? GS
|
1 | mole_h_step.c | 1412 | equivalent reaction for H2* is not included in chemistry, Big h2 does not include this reaction, what to do? GS
|
1 | mole_h_step.c | 1431 | equivalent reaction for H2* is not included in chemistry, Big h2 does not include this reaction, what to do? GS
|
1 | mole_h_step.c | 1463 | equivalent reaction for H2* is not included in chemistry, Big h2 does not include this reaction, what to do? GS
|
1 | mole_h_step.c | 1479 | equivalent reaction for H2* is not included in chemistry, Big h2 does not include this reaction, what to do? GS
|
1 | mole_h_step.c | 1504 | equivalent reaction for H2* is not included in chemistry, Big h2 does not include this reaction, what to do? GS
|
1 | mole_h_step.c | 1787 | equivalent reaction for H2* is not included in chemistry, Big h2 does not include this reaction, what to do? GS
|
1 | mole_h_step.c | 1845 | equivalent reaction for H2* is not included in chemistry, Big h2 does not include this reaction, what to do? reverse of this reaction i not in detailed balance,why? GS
|
1 | mole_h_step.c | 1904 | equivalent reaction for H2* is not included in chemistry, Big h2 does not include this reaction, what to do? GS
|
1 | mole_h_step.c | 1926 | equivalent reaction for H2* is not included in chemistry, Big h2 does not include this reaction, what to do? GS
|
1 | mole_h_step.c | 1972 | equivalent reaction for H2* is not included in chemistry, Big h2 does not include this reaction, what to do? GS
|
1 | mole_h_step.c | 2228 | equivalent reaction for H2* is not included in chemistry, Big h2 does not include this reaction, what to do? GS
|
1 | mole_h_step.c | 903 | equivalent reaction for H2* is not included in chemistry, Big h2 does not include this reaction, what to do? GS
|
1 | mole_h_step.c | 949 | equivalent reaction for H2* is not included in chemistry, Big h2 does not include this reaction, what to do? GS
|
1 | opacity_addtotal.c | 514 | stupid - why this test on opacity_abs ? - we only get here if we already passed above test on this very thing
|
1 | pressure_total.c | 200 | do something with this pressure term
|
1 | prt_linepres.c | 61 | make this and eval rad pressure same routine, with flag saying to print contributors - copy code from other routine - this code has been left behind
|
1 | prt_lines_lv1_k_zn.c | 668 | this does not belong here - should be where radius incremnted
|
1 | radius_next.c | 1288 | rm logic detecting temp and pres failure - these normally occur near troubled parts of cooling curve
|
1 | rt_escprob.c | 1037 | dynamics; this test assumes that neg vel are subsonic, so that sobolev length would overestimate the optical depth, since ion is at most present over computed slab, and possibly more.
|
1 | rt_escprob.c | 1162 | dynamics; this test assumes that neg vel are subsonic, so that sobolev length would overestimate the optical depth, since ion is at most present over computed slab, and possibly more.
|
1 | rt_line_one_tauinc.c | 32 | dynamics; this test assumes that neg vel are subsonic, so that sobolev length would overestimate the optical depth, since ion is at most present over computed slab, and possibly more.
|
2 | assert_results.c | 282 | NB this is not used, should do both, and more molecules (H2 only for now)
|
2 | atmdat_2photon.c | 366 | How should these affect locally emitted continuum calculated in rtdiffuse? Just subtract these rates from the emitted ones?
|
2 | atmdat_coll_ion.c | 102 | all of these are used in only three lines in this same file, and go into making a double. So all of these casts to float just turn intermediate doubles into floats to be turned back into doubles. Either promote ".CF" to double and or change all of these vectors to floats. In both cases all the casts to float should be removed.
|
2 | atmdat_H_phot_cs.c | 15 | all of these ".STH" go straight into doubles. Change definition of itmps or .STH to avoid demotion.
|
2 | atmdat_readin.c | 911 | - check these
|
2 | atom_fe2ovr.c | 153 | hydro.dstfe2lya is always multiplied by a double and stuffed into a double. defining it as a float causes lost precision here.
|
2 | atom_level3.c | 208 | test on c checks whether collisions are possible at this temperature, should add photo excitation
|
2 | atom_level3.c | 219 | these pops ARE NOT defined below
|
2 | atom_oi.c | 216 | following needed to get badbugs/bug8.in to work
|
2 | atom_oi.c | 222 | following needed to get badbugs/bug5.in to work
|
2 | atom_oi.c | 381 | this must have all stimulated emission, pump by cont, etc
|
2 | atom_pop5.c | 249 | p(5) was very slightly negative (1e-40) for SII in dqher.in
|
2 | cddefines.c | 294 | do something with this or set to LONG_MAX? after moving collapsed levels to iso.nCollapsed, this variable does nothing. iso.nTopOff[ipHE_LIKE] = 0;
|
2 | cddefines.c | 349 | Change this to higher number. Make this change by itself after all other changes pass suite.
|
2 | cddrive.c | 1749 | this should have a last argument like cdIonFrac for whether or not weighting is wrt electron density
|
2 | cont_createpointers.c | 1100 | what are we trying to print here?
|
2 | cont_createpointers.c | 488 | this is redundant with contents of oxygen line arrays use them instead when removing this, make sure all line intensity predictions also go into oi line arrays
|
2 | cont_gaunt.c | 137 | - These are liberal bounds, in final product, this ASSERT should be much more demanding.
|
2 | cont_gaunt.c | 154 | - insert reference
|
2 | cont_gaunt.c | 288 | - insert reference
|
2 | cont_gaunt.c | 339 | - this check may also too liberal.
|
2 | cont_gaunt.c | 382 | - pick these interface values and stick with it...best results have been 0.4, 1.5
|
2 | cont_pump.c | 26 | if used, add damp as arg since calling routine probably evaluated it
|
2 | conv_base.c | 854 | this assert is not passed if error made much smaller. This error should be related to a check on convergence of the molecular networks and their sum rules, with a criteria used here and there
|
2 | cool_carb.c | 234 | add term for protons from Rouef, E., & Le Bourlot, J. 1990, A&A, 236, 515
|
2 | cool_iron.c | 1060 | update atomic data to Chidichimo et al 1999 AASup 137, 175
|
2 | cool_iron.c | 1082 | * following not in cooling function
|
2 | cool_iron.c | 2338 | put in temperature dependence
|
2 | cool_iron.c | 2792 | put in temperature dependence
|
2 | cool_iron.c | 696 | - ground term is actually a fix level system, the vectors are created, with pointers ipFe1_54m , ipFe1_111m, must add collision date, use larger model atom
|
2 | cool_iron.c | 807 | following to stop insane FeX strengths >>chng 96 jul 11, removed 1 10 factor, so using real data, 90.01
|
2 | cool_magn.c | 191 | use AtomSeqBeryllium here
|
2 | cool_neon.c | 129 | transfer these lines
|
2 | cool_nitr.c | 78 | use atom_level3
|
2 | cool_oxyg.c | 411 | add proper temperature dependence when good coll stren calculations become available
|
2 | cool_oxyg.c | 483 | put all these in cooling
|
2 | cool_phos.c | 27 | update to Tayal data, email of April 22 2003, must be published
|
2 | cool_sili.c | 256 | - update to this reference for As >>refer Si7 As Galavis, M.E., Mendoza, C., * Zeippen, C.J. 1997, A&AS, 123, 159
|
2 | dynamics.c | 143 | this should be setable at run time as per Robin Williams emailrshock = 4e16;
|
2 | dynamics.c | 1645 | Need to include divergence terms in pressure balance if flux index is != 0
|
2 | dynamics.c | 1667 | Need to include divergence terms in pressure balance if flux index is != 0
|
2 | dynamics.c | 414 | Switch to supersonic when bad enough failure for STRONGD -- need to improve this logic when the p(rho) data is cleaner
|
2 | grains.c | 1230 | should any of the following 3 statements be removed
|
2 | grains.c | 1618 | this algorithm might be more efficient with Brent
|
2 | grains.c | 1675 | use something like log(ThermRatio) + log(delta) ????
|
2 | grains.c | 2125 | remove gv.bin[nd]->lgChrgConverged, gv.bin[nd]->LowestPot, gv.bin[nd]->dstpotsav gv.bin[nd]->RateUp, gv.bin[nd]->RateDn; also gv.HighestIon??, HighestIonStage()??
|
2 | grains.c | 2375 | note that the number of primary electrons is given by yhat, which may not be one, so this is not necessarily consistent
|
2 | grains.c | 2377 | avAuger depends on grain charge, this should be treated explicitly here
|
2 | grains.c | 4425 | a self-consistent treatment for the heating by Auger electrons should be used
|
2 | grains.c | 4426 | a self-consistent treatment for the heating by Compton recoil electrons should be used
|
2 | grains.c | 4908 | a self-consistent treatment for the heating by Auger electrons should be used
|
2 | grains.c | 4909 | a self-consistent treatment for the heating by Compton recoil electrons should be used
|
2 | grains_mie.c | 1865 | impose size limits on PAH's, changeover to graphite ??
|
2 | grains_mie.c | 1866 | detect if PAH's are present in ionized regions ??
|
2 | grains_mie.c | 2038 | include code for interpolating inv_att_len somewhere!!
|
2 | grains_mie.c | 2039 | why is charge of pah2_ism_01.opc so different??
|
2 | heat_sum.c | 588 | find correct high-energy limit for these
|
2 | helike.c | 155 | remove this when this routine really controls helium itself
|
2 | helike.c | 455 | say where these come from...and do something with them!
|
2 | helike_create.c | 1553 | this is part of the induce 2nu problem, which must be fixed for both he and h sequences.
|
2 | helike_create.c | 1808 | - this structure is currently only used for helium itself... stuff numbers in for other elements, or drop the [nelem] dimension off of helike.HeCS
|
2 | helike_cs.c | 125 | rewrite HeCSInterp and all called routines to use a temp parameter, rather than phycon.te
|
2 | helike_cs.c | 315 | find ioniz rates for helium like species, these are hydrogenic rates
|
2 | helike_einsta.c | 338 | find a transition probability for this 2^3P0 - 2^3P1 transition. It will require a bit of trickery to insert into the rate matrix, because of the fact that the lower level has a higher index. See discussion "Energy order within 2 3P" near the top of helike.c
|
2 | helike_level.c | 1149 | This is only temporary!
|
2 | helike_level.c | 419 | Can't be used for helium sequence because suprathermals rate has not been split up into individual levels for helium sequence. So Secondaries structure must be extended to include helium levels before the below code can be implemented. This is not a pressing correction because total suprathermal is already included for the sequence, but this should not be put off for too long because it should not be too difficult to do correctly.
|
2 | helike_level.c | 439 | these are all wrong -- see comment above
|
2 | helike_level.c | 828 | at the moment can only assert these for the atom, and for Vriens gbar.
|
2 | helike_recom.c | 3085 | put Burgess reference here
|
2 | helike_recom.c | 3086 | I can't find this reference, should be killed anyway? --RLP
|
2 | helike_recom.c | 3157 | use a canned interpolation routine, no need for special one here
|
2 | hydro_vs_rates.c | 286 | make these effective quantum numbers?
|
2 | hydro_vs_rates.c | 446 | This routine, like the above one, needs to use proper energy.
|
2 | hydro_vs_rates.c | 500 | sometimes rate is negative...is that okay?
|
2 | ion_oxyge.c | 117 | this will be zero in current form of atmdat_phfit set 2s**2 rate to rate for O V
|
2 | ion_solver.c | 664 | renorm should == 1 when the molecules and ionization are in equilibrium. Should monitor this figure of merit in calling routine.
|
2 | iso_cool.c | 15 | - if pc lint ever fixes this bug in their product, remove this -e
|
2 | iso_cool.c | 85 | this routine dumps all heating and cooling into only a very few lables, it would be best to break these out into individual labels that show element, iso sequence, and agent
|
2 | iso_create.c | 562 | this will not work if highest level is resolved
|
2 | iso_photo.c | 110 | - hydro.lgHInducImp should depend on iso and nelem, even better - just call one gamnc and within that code check to see whether induced is important by looking at occnum near threshold
|
2 | iter_startend.c | 108 | this does not belong here - move to where main data created
|
2 | mole_h2.c | 3150 | - put H2Lines in outward beams in RT_diffuse
|
2 | mole_h2.c | 3158 | put supra thermal excitation into excitation of electronic bands
|
2 | mole_h_drive.c | 504 | following always true, why? either remove test or use it - it is here to save time - this step routine is called very often
|
2 | mole_h_drive.c | 532 | this should be done with new populations after converged soln
|
2 | mole_h_step.c | 1206 | process is net source term for H(n=3) states, must be added in
|
2 | mole_h_step.c | 1234 | process is net ionization term for H(n=3) states
|
2 | mole_h_step.c | 1897 | this rate drives numerical instability in such models as secondary1 and 2.in
|
2 | mole_h_step.c | 1939 | equivalent reaction for H2* is not included in chemistry, Big h2 does not include this reaction, what to do? GS
|
2 | mole_h_step.c | 1953 | equivalent reaction for H2* is not included in chemistry, Big h2 does not include this reaction, what to do? GS
|
2 | mole_h_step.c | 2036 | must add process H2+ + H- => H2 + H, Dalgarno&Lepp 87
|
2 | mole_h_step.c | 2041 | put in H2+ + gamma => H + H+
|
2 | mole_h_step.c | 2244 | equivalent reaction for H2* is not included in chemistry, Big h2 does not include this reaction, what to do? GS
|
2 | mole_h_step.c | 2705 | equivalent reaction for H2* is not included in chemistry, Big h2 does not include this reaction, what to do? GS
|
2 | mole_h_step.c | 2719 | equivalent reaction for H2* is not included in chemistry, Big h2 does not include this reaction, what to do? GS
|
2 | mole_h_step.c | 2803 | equivalent reaction for H2* is not included in chemistry, Big h2 does not include this reaction, what to do? GS
|
2 | mole_h_step.c | 598 | - put in actual composition dependent Tad - this is only valid for bare surfaces - not ice - for ice Tad is 555K hmi.Tad is binding energy expressed as a temperature note that hmi.Tad is set to 800. in zero tau_nu the first equation in section 2.5 equation one paragraph before equation 2 at low grain temperatures all end in para, J=0
|
2 | opacity_addtotal.c | 93 | add charged heavy elements
|
2 | opacity_createall.c | 1546 | update to astro-ph/0308073, Lee, H-W, ApJ in press
|
2 | pressure_total.c | 120 | this is the molecular binding energy (?) not set to anything
|
2 | pressure_total.c | 177 | - should this include mass in grains?
|
2 | prt_comment.c | 1104 | this statement needs to be reinstated with a better test for presence in the H II region
|
2 | prt_comment.c | 1488 | extend to all iso and elem
|
2 | prt_lines_continuum.c | 55 | this block of lines should have nInu, InwT, InwC like main vector of continuum points
|
2 | prt_lines_helium.c | 533 | - this structure is currently only used for helium itself... stuff numbers in for other elements, or drop the [nelem] dimension off of CaABLines
|
2 | prt_lines_helium.c | 673 | - this structure is currently only used for helium itself... stuff numbers in for other elements, or drop the [nelem] dimension off of CaABLines
|
2 | prt_lines_lv1_k_zn.c | 878 | put this line back in! EFF = 43.6 (43.6 + 0.27*COLFAC)
|
2 | prt_lines_lv1_k_zn.c | 977 | put this in
|
2 | prt_lines_lv1_li_ne.c | 638 | these are actually in the optical depth arrays, should be moved to call PutLine - but some needed vars are not defined in structure
|
2 | punch_do.c | 2986 | - NB - if continuum resolution changed the lines WILL NOT WORK
|
2 | punch_special.c | 45 | this most likely needs to be changed in light of new 2nu treatment
|
2 | radius_next.c | 6 | - this routine is very important since it sets the pace for the calculation, and directly affects the convergence of the code. Most of the logic is very old and messy. 1) make sure all test cases have punch dr 2) cat all these reasons together into one file and sort on the reason 3) discover what logic is the main pacesetter for the code 4) which are never triggered and so can be removed
|
2 | rt_diffuse.c | 134 | This doesn't really seem to be the expression above!!!
|
2 | rt_diffuse.c | 153 | Steve Kraemer says we're lacking radio recombination continua. Is this why? --RLP
|
2 | rt_diffuse.c | 396 | should use ConEmitLocal for all continua, but not followed by DiffuseEscape - put that at the end. Once continua all bundled this way, it will be easy to save them as a function of depth and then do exact rt
|
2 | rt_diffuse.c | 458 | Replace this constant with the appropriate macro, if any
|
2 | rt_diffuse.c | 634 | add fegrain to outward beams, but within main formalism by including grains in all x-ray processes
|
2 | rt_escprob.c | 903 | this min is because there are no calculations that show what to do for beta beyound this value
|
2 | rt_line_one.c | 694 | - consider using ipDEST_INCOM instead of K2, it is much faster
|
2 | rt_ots.c | 143 | should also check whether IonLo is in bounds - in func_set_ion test He0 is set to zero, so this does not do anything. as NISO grows this will become larger waste of time
|
2 | rt_stark.c | 63 | - Stark is disabled for now since Lya escape causes density dependent feedback on the radiative transfer. Would need to redo the escape probs every time the electron density is updated - see blr89.in for an example
|
2 | zero.c | 1006 | file opacities are disabled for now - reinstate this when arrays settle down
|
2 | zero.c | 1573 | why are higher lyman lines (ipResoRedist) not same as for H-like?
|
2 | zero.c | 390 | change this to CS_new
|
3 | cont_createmesh.c | 451 | consider making the fine opacity array a double. with a float, the opacity itself often becomes a denormalized number, it then becomes significant when multiplied by dr - can cause numerical noise. this is why the coarse opacity array is a double
|
3 | cool_carb.c | 275 | change to atom_level3
|
3 | zero.c | 1044 | next two should be constants since not reset - are hardwired limits to code's range of temperature validity
|